Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070 +1096%
7.465 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Oct 2018
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
480
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
103.7 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
233.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.93 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.465 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
233.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
TU106
Turks GL
GPU Variant
TU106-400A-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy