Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon X1050

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon X1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 50W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
24W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV410
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
110 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.12 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
4.4
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy