Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +52%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Dec 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy