Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 345W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1677MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling +2101%
13.74 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Aug 2017
FirePro
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1406 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1677 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.3 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
429.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.48 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.74 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
858.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
345W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Vega 10
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XTX
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy