Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +1606%
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Nov 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
6
Compute Units
-
480
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GT218
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy