ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

VS

ATI FirePro V4900 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages

Lower TDP (75W vs 90W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages

Released 10 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock1740MHz

More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

1568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

FirePro V4900

0.768 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +827%

7.127 TFLOPS

FirePro V4900

VS

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Graphics Card

Nov 2011

Release Date

Jan 2022

FirePro

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1545 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1740 MHz

1000 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

64.00GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

16

6

Compute Units

-

480

Shading Units

2048

24

TMUs

64

8

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

64

-

RT Cores

16

8 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

256 KB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

55.68 GPixel/s

19.20 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

111.4 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

7.127 TFLOPS

768.0 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

7.127 TFLOPS

-

FP64 (double)

111.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks

GPU Name

GA107

Turks XT GL

GPU Variant

GA107-140-A1

TeraScale 2

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

40 nm

Process Size

8 nm

0.716 billion

Transistors

8.7 billion

118 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

75W

TDP

90W

250 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.4

OpenGL

4.6

1.2

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.6

5.0

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs ATI FirePro V4900

2

AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4900

3

NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro V4900

4

NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs ATI FirePro V4900

5

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon RX 550X

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs ATI FirePro V4900

7

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs ATI FirePro V4900

8

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2

9

ATI FirePro V4900 vs Intel Arc A310

10

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip