Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon 550

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon 550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 56.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon 550 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1183MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon 550 +57%
1.211 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1183 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
56.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
8
480
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.93 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1211 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1211 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
75.71 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Lexa
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy