Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6530

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6530

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6530 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 19.20GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6530 's Advantages
Lower TDP (39W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +47%
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6530
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
19.20GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
400
24
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
39W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Redwood
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO (215-0757004)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy