Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 768GB)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 +18%
0.907 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jul 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
480
Shading Units
336
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.450 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
907.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
75.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GF104
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
GF104-300-KB-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy