Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 6950 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6950 +193%
2.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Dec 2010
FirePro
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1408
24
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
563.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Cayman
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO (215-0807019)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy