Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +8299%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
5376
24
TMUs
336
8
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 31
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy