Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
17696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +11756%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Dec 2022
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
480
Shading Units
18176
24
TMUs
568
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
AD102
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy