Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 74W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800 +121%
1.104 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
320
40
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

74W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
Oland
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy