Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +271%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

74W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
Tahiti
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy