Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro V5900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

AMD FirePro V5900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +1650%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Aug 2018
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
614.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
230W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Vega 10
Cayman LE WS
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy