Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD FirePro S7150

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +103%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Feb 2016
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
32
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Tonga
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
5 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy