Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD FirePro W4300

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +29%
1.856 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Dec 2015
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Bonaire
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy