CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
VS
ATI FirePro V7900
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega 64
+582%
12.66 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
VS
Radeon RX Vega 64
Graphics Card
May 2011
Release Date
Aug 2017
FirePro
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
64
1280
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.33 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Cayman
GPU Name
Vega 10
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
295W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB
2
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM
3
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
4
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
5
ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT
6
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD FirePro RG220
7
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
8
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
9
ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI Radeon X1700 SE
10
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy