Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
800 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +37%
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480
1.345 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Mar 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
15
1280
Shading Units
480
80
TMUs
60
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.03 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1345 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
168.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GF100
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF100-375-A3
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy