Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1777MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB +390%
9.098 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1552 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1777 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
1280
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.86 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
142.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.098 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.098 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
142.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GA106
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
GA106-150-KA-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
12 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy