Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

ATI FirePro V8700 Duo vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 Duo and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 Duo
1.2 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX +318%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
800
Shading Units
1408
40
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
TU116
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy