Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

ATI FirePro V8700 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700 +733%
1.2 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
120
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

151W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
RV630
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy