Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

ATI FirePro V8700 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 290W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X +369%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
2816
40
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
290W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Hawaii
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy