Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8750 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

ATI FirePro V8750 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8750
1.2 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +952%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
800
Shading Units
4480
40
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GA100
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy