Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs Intel Arc A770

ATI FirePro V8800 vs Intel Arc A770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Arc A770 +644%
19.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
DG2-512
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy