Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (208W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +454%
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

208W
TDP
215W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
R600
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy