Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1560 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +8150%
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

208W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV620
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy