Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD FirePro S9170

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +98%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jul 2015
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
275W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Hawaii
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy