Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +59%
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jul 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Polaris 23
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy