Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (208W vs 365W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (164.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +112%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 590
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
854 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
164.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1600
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.46 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.91 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
155.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
365W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GF110
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy