Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +26%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy