Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 208W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1600
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV530
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

208W
TDP
41W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
Floppy

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy