ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 208W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+354%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1600
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
208W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
AD107
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
