Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

ATI FirePro V9800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1560 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800 +6376%
2.72 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV610
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy