Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

ATI FirePro V9800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +162%
7.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1545 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1600
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.127 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.127 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
111.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
90W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GA107
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
GA107-140-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy