Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1226MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560 XT +61%
4.394 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Mar 2019
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1074 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1226 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.23 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
137.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.394 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.394 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
274.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 LE1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy