Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 GME to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1420MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 GME +140%
6.543 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Mar 2020
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1257 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1420 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.44 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
204.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.543 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.543 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
409.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Polaris 20
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XTR (215-0910066)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy