Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300 +15%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x HDMI 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 24
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy