Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

ATI FirePro V9800 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 and 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +204%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jun 2023
FirePro
Generation
Console GPU(ASUS)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
-

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
518.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Phoenix
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
4 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
25.39 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
178 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy