Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

AMD FirePro W2100 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 75W)
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 246% (2350MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +1006%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1024
20
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy