Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (1188MHz vs 680MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 +319%
1.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
1024 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy