Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400

AMD FirePro W2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 26W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100 +1971%
0.435 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
-
680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
8
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

26W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy