Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 200% (2040MHz vs 680MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 26W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +620%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
680 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy