Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +300%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Hawaii
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy