Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT +310%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Oct 2019
FirePro
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1408
48
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 14
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy