Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

AMD FirePro W4100
VS
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
AMD FirePro W4100
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX +1616%
11.07 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
512
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
TU102
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy