Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +427%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy