Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

AMD FirePro W4100 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 215W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100 +35%
0.645 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
215W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
R600
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy