Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2 +773%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
580W
250 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Hawaii
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy