Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon R9 390X

AMD FirePro W4100 vs AMD Radeon R9 390X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 390X 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 390X +816%
5.914 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
184.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.914 TFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
739.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Grenada
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
Grenada XT (215-0880004)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy